Hi there - I'd love to comment for myself that since I stripper, I watch less porn on the internet (especially videos - but I shall say 'generally') - due to finding Istripper more 'personal' which I love - It also brings me up to better vibes with myself and other people in general.

I also spend more time doing useful things
Who else feels the same?

@xerato It depends with me. I can sometimes use Istripper when I have to work on something really boring on my laptop and then It helps me to get through that. (the beautiful women put me in a better mood, I guess) So in that case it helps me to do useful things. Dont know if thats what u meant.

iN general...everything has it's time and place...common cents will tell you that moderation is key however common cents isn't always easy to cum by :D

I can have girls stripping all day on my second monitor, it's good company. Some models can be VERY distracting though :p but it would be weird having hardcore porn there all day, even softcore solos would be off.

I watch less porn nowdays not just because of istripper but I just can't be bother with much of the hardcore stuff, there is a few exceptions of course - If like if Sapphira were to....you know what I mean (fantasy) but she is unlikely to and I wouldn't like to see her go the way of a lot of hardcore stuff! (A lot is just a put off for me and boring!) I just like looking at the beautiful women pranking/dancing around in sexy gear! istripper girls is a good distraction far better and even healthier in my book than the other harder stuff! (I am relitive new here to istripper because of the other stuff is so so! Glad I found a more classy site.) Now as Popeved said (and I agree) the key is everything in moderation! Xerato keep getting those better vibes :) Cheers

It really annoys me when people call erotic art "porn"...so annoying! Erotic art is not "porn"...it is erotic art!

@Pop: From Wikipedia...

Defining erotic art is difficult since perceptions of both what is erotic and what is art fluctuate. A sculpture of a phallus in some African cultures may be considered a traditional symbol of potency though not overtly erotic.

In addition, a distinction is often made between erotic art and pornography (which also depicts scenes of love-making and is intended to evoke erotic arousal, but is not usually considered art). The distinction may lie in intent and message; erotic art would be items intended as pieces of art, encapturing formal elements of art, and drawing on other historical artworks. Pornography may also use these tools, but is primarily intended to arouse one sexually. Nevertheless, these elements of distinction are highly subjective.

For instance, Justice Potter Stewart of the Supreme Court of the United States, in attempting to explain "hard-core" pornography, or what is obscene, famously wrote, "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced ... ut I know it when I see it.

Not agreeing or disagreeing with you here. I do agree tho that it is highly subjective :)

Edit: No idea why the last bits came out in BOLD. I didn't do it! Honestly! :/

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot???

@Hombre, I know caps is SHOUTING..not sure what speaking in bold is..probably talking loud.

@xerato iStripper legally is 'porn' however lots of people continue to enjoy Totem products well after any of them may have cum and thats rarely the case with mainstream porn. iStripper could have been a failure if @Team weren't magicians in bringing out the best in the personalities of the girls and it shows.

@Hombre - Almost certainly what happened in you post is that the terminating /bold tag (in square brackets) was lost from the text that you quoted. Click on "How to use this editor" at the bottom of the forum page if you do not know what I mean by the /bold tag.

I didn't touch the bold tag. I used the quote/unquote html tags to add the post as a quote. The original had no bold parts. It just appeared that way and when I tried to edit it to normal text, my own text appeared as bold also. As I said, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot??? Weird... I swear I did NOT use the BOLD tags.

In my opinion, totem products, are much more classier than regular porn. There is an appreciation of the beauty of the female form that you don't feel when you watch regular porn. Regular porn, in my opinion, satisfies certain animalist urgers in men, and there is nothing wrong with that. But, there is much more to istripper than just fulfilling those urges. You get to see up close and personal the perfection of the human female form, and to get ***** with it. You also feel a certain personal connection to the performer that you don't usually feel when you watch regular porn. Just my 2 cents.

@mo7ibelkuss

I totally agree with your statement.

For me this stuff isn't really "porn" at all in the sense of using it to satisfy basic urges. For me it's more of "I get a personal show from some of the most beautiful young women on the planet" kind of thing. Right here in my own home, don't have to dress up, go to a club, spend a fortune and then drive home frustrated... A show that in most cases I would have no way to get any other way.

I'll gladly put up with the "work in progress" GUI to get the content offered here.

This is an interesting topic, I've also considered iStripper as something different than regular porn. Regular porn is made to get you off, but iStripper I think is more about sitting back, relaxing and enjoying the show. The models are displaying every inch of their bodies to the viewer, nothing is hidden. It's almost like a car show, but with naked women instead, showing off their sexy contours, giving you a close look under their hood. Sometimes when in the mood, I will play a card and then look up the model dancing to find her hardcore stuff. But when I just want to watch and admire their beauty and sexuality, iStripper is the place to go.

@Hombre - The accidental bolding is indeed wierd, I had thought that there must have been an unmatched embeded bold tag in the quoted text. Being oddly intrigued I looked at the Wiki page and examined the text using Wiki's edit function. There isn't a full bold tag, but the b in but is in square brackets and this is enough to be recognised as a bold tag. This agrees with the description of the bold tag given when you click on "How to use this editor" at the bottom of each form page. I have no idea why the square brackets are present in the Wiki page's source, but they probably should not have been there in the first place.