I am not sure but I think that there were two slightly different gold bikinis.

As people aquire more cards, they will have to research how to transfer playing card files to a different storage medium. IMHO customer disk failure or memory exhaustion are the biggest future risk to ongoing profitability of the company.

This whole process needs to be run from the Settings page with a
more 'human' interactive style of dialogue. eg:

[mouseover] .. We notice you have plugged in a new storage device. Drive G
You have x terabytes currently devoted to models and associated data
You have y terabytes available on your currently used device
there are z terabytes available on drive G

Do you want to transfer some or all of your istripper cards onto G ?
iStripper can share cards over two devices.
The process will usually not involve card downloads from the internet.

Yes / No

Yes ~ follow the instructions to commence transferring cards
No ~ return to settings

Do you want to make a backup of some or all of your existing cards ?

Yes / No

Yes ~ follow the instructions to commence copying cards for backup
No ~ return to settings

Note: these actions will occur locally in the background while iStripper is playing. Depending on how many cards are processed it may take several days to complete. You will be able to continue using iStripper during the transfers.

[progress meter]

I'd love to see a more scaleable interface. I use a 55" HDTV as a monitor with a max resolution of 1920X1080. Whenever I upgrade, the GUI becomes substantially larger than my desktop. When I do FINALLY manage to reach one of the corners and am able to rescale, the vertical resolution still exceeds the max size I can display properly.
I updated the GUI about an hr ago. I have to position the screen so the left wallpaper is partially off the viewable screen, and most of the top taskbar items are hidden offscreen as well.
I would LOVE to see the interface become much more automatic. Detect the screen resolution and make the GUI fit that resolution AUTOMATICALLY. Give us an option in the control panel to scale each model/clip to fit without going outside the max window.
For example, many of the clips show the model sitting or lying down, and those clips can be displayed at a fairly high resolution. When the model stands up, her head goes far beyond the top of the view window. Do a check when each clip starts, and scale the clip to fit the screen automatically. Tweaking each model's card to fit the screen separately is REALLY time consumong when you have over 1.000 of them. Make it user friendly,

@Sciguy - other than the physical size of my second screen my set up is the same as yours, but I do not ***** the problems that you are reporting when playing the clips.

@Sciguy - in my previous post I said that I did not have any of the problems you reported when playing clips. However, I had been having the other problem mentioned in your post, namely that part of the title bar was off the top of the screen when the iStripper GUI was maximised. But this was not unique to istripper, I had the same problem with other programs. I fixed it by changing a setting of the screen itself - not on the computer but via the screen's own settings available via a menu that pops up when a real button at the botom of the screen is pressed. In my case changing the "Picture Size" from 16:9 to "Fit Screen" was what was needed. Your hardware probably has a similar feature.

Hi Sciguy77..............Long time no see............I'd get a smaller TV............😎😋

Sometimes I miss your popup notifications about specials or new versions. I should be able to access these from within the desktop app also, There should be a notifications section.

@mcp111 - What would you want that is not already covered by the featured/news page?

@Interestingcard - Although I can't see any problem with such an option I for one would almost certainly never enable it as I prefer to control when potentialy large downloads occur. Furthermore I do not think that an option that would save a few seconds every week, or however often you choose to check for updates, should be a priority item for implementation.

@Interestingcard ; I do not know what your data cap or monthly data charges are, nor do I need to know that. I do, however, know what my data cap/overage charges are and therefore agree with @TheEmu that potentially large downloads should be under the user's control. I'll go one step farther and add that all updates should be under the user's control.

Wanna see how the otherhalf lives? Just disconnect your system from the wall or your Wi-Fi router and use a cell phone hotspot or a cellular dongle for a month.

An addition i would like is a 'mark all as read' type feature for the forum. (just like e-mails)
The postings can soon mount up if you are unable to read them.

The only thing that auto updates on my computer is the operating system. "I" control/decide when everything else updates.

I would be fine with them providing the option for those who want auto updates. I wouldn't use it though.

@Interestingcard - for some of us the only connection to the internet at home is via the moble phone network using an adapter plugged into a USB port. I therefore keep auto-updates to a minimum. There are others, typically gamers, who find that even with a decent cabled connection that mass downloads interfere with other programs.

Neither of these in themselves make your idea a bad one, as long as it is not the default, but it is such a ***** matter to check manually - I make it two mouseclicks to find if there are outstanding updates followed by a control-A and a mouseclick to initiate them. So at best auto-update would be a nice to have option but, I think, for most of us it would be a low priority one to add to the software.

Istripper is a computer program for desktop computers, and usually used at home Not a cell application. I don't see the point there.

I am fully aware that iStripper is a program for desktop computers usually used at home. The point is how a desktop computer connects to the internet.

@91hebasu ; I don't even let the operating system update automatically.

This should have been an addiition to my previous post, but I can no longer edit it

@Interestingcard - To make my position quite clear, I would be in favour of adding an auto-update option (as long as it is not the default) but not as a priority item which is what this thread was about. Had it been in the usual "Ideas and suggestions" area of the forum I probably would not have commented at all. There are many more features that could be improved, such as the way the filters work and the forum search, that to my mind should have much higher priorities.

Auto Card Update as an Option is also supported by me.
but it must Default to OFF, and the User has to enable it.

@Interestingcard - do you really think that it should be a priority to save a some users a few seconds of time per week or to fix problems and even bugs that make other features almost unusable at times - e.g. try searching the forums for a three letter word such as USB that you know has been used in a recent posting, or to have the results of a search appear in any sort of logical time order, or to use the category filter so that only those cards that are either tagged as "leather" or "latex" are displayed.

Well, thing is, Rex was asking what we would fix with the software........Not the forum.

@91hebasu - In the original post of this thread Rex asked about "fixes or add ons to iStripper", that most certainly includes the forum (at least when accesed via the GUI rather than via a web browser, and even then the web browser interface would qualify as an "add on")

You need to scroll back to the first page where I asked software or other things, including the site/forum, and Rex specified software.

Spin it however you want. The forum is not part of the software. No matter how it's accessed.

@91hebasu - your post, in it entirity, was

What exactly are we looking at making changes to ?

The software ? The site ? Production ? Post production ? Everything in general ?

You did not mention the forum. The "site" is not the same as the forum. However, even if you exclude the forum itself its viewer is a major part of the iStripper software and the forum related things I refered to were to that part of the software.

Whether you want to accept it or not, the forum is not part of the software. No matter how you spin it or how much you want to debate.

@91hebasu - no matter how you want to spin it the forum viewer is part of the iStripper software. If not where on earth do you think the viewer is implemented?

I definitely agree that the forum is in need of some refinement. As a matter of fact, I can't tell you how many times I've said something about the search tool behind closed doors.

It's unrelated to the software though. Now is not the time for it and this is not the thread for discussing it.

@91hebasu - the forum viewer/browser is a part of the software - which has a two component client-server configuration. Do you also exclude the "featured", "Girls Store" and "Previews" tabs of the GUI from being part of "the software"?

@Rex
Hello Rex
Is there any chance that we can have our avatars displayed fully nude in the forum. I thought if it was tasteful
nudity that it should be fine and it doesnt ***** to ask.
Thanks 😊

You can keep trying to shove that down my throat all you want to emu. It's not fitting.

OK, then which parts of vghd.exe (and any lbraries it loads) do you regard as not being part of "the software", and why, I can not see how one part of a program can be part of "the software" and another part of the same program is not.

@TheEmu I fully agree with you there.
Anything/Everything that is controlled/accessed via vghd.exe IS part of 'the software'.