:(

If so, perhaps it would be better to close this one, before gets too hot... };-))

CV said "Really I am a female so cus I am watching this software does that mean I am now about to head out to the nearest strip joint, take me clothes of and twerk a little whilst spinning round a pole, and then aftwards go for a swing in the park whilst removing my brassier!!!"


I'LL BUY THAT CARD!
:)

So I guess its safe to say this will never be shown on VG??

And I would take lots of pictures, lol.

I fully support the right of others to have and buy these cards
I don't like them myself , That's me , I asked the question to see how many people agreed with me.
That's all.

Guns I have no problem with in General.
People mishandling Guns I have a slight problem with (I nearly got shot in the Behind by a guy who had seen one too many Rambo movies)
As to the copying
Not Everyone who is a member of this site is in their forties or fifties
There could indeed be members who are literally just 18 and who could be handling guns for the first time (and blow off their own nadgers)

I would like to see a filter for "Guns" or possibly "weapons"

If you like girls with Guns vote the top option
I will respect your position and democratic right to have that view.

I don't like Guns in shows
I also don't like body cream , the cage , Nurses outfits , Pvc , Whips, chains, excessive tattoos or Lime green Panties.
But I will make an exception in almost all cases for the right Girl.
(Demi can walk around in Full body armour carrying a GE Minigun if she likes.)

You're comparing Rambo movies to a small percentage of shows on VG. See where your logic fails? People are much more easily influenced by Rambo because lots of people want to BE Rambo. Anyway, those 18 yr old members are too busy beating their dicks to take lessons how to fire a gun from a desktop stripper. And besides, those same kids have been playing GTA and other ***** video games since they were 12. But even then, most of them DO realize its just a game and not real life. So while I understand your concern, your aim should be towards bad parents that let their kids do whatever the hell they want and never teach them to regard other people.

Funny,

I just wrote a blog about 2nd Amendment rights here in the US.
Too many people Pushing for Gun Control and Bans..
Claiming that GUNs ***** people..

NOT true.. I have never heard of a Gun Loading itself, jumping up out of the Gun rack, or off the Table, hunting down it's victim, and then Shooting them.

GUNs do not *****..
People *****..

Here is an Excerpt from that blog..

in the US we have about 820,000 licensed Practicing Doctors.
http://www.fsmb.org/pdf/census.pdf

in the US there are About 300,000,000 Guns. and
http://www.gunfaq.org/2013/03/how-many-guns-in-the-united-states/

in the Us there are about 250,000 registered cars
https://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2012/tables/12s1096.pdf

In the US there are about 885,000 registered motorcycles
http://tinyurl.com/kq7wxl2

Deaths Caused by Doctors each Year:
195,000 die each year because of a Doctor
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/11856.php

Number of People that Die in Motor Vehicle incidents
33,687 per year
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/*****.htm

Number of people the Die due to motorcycle incidents
3181 per year
http://tinyurl.com/lftwosn

Number of people that die from gun related incidents
31,672 per year
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/*****.htm

Percentage of Deaths per Doctor 195000 / 820000 = 0.23780 = 23.78%

Percentage of Deaths per Car 33687 / 250000 = 0.13474 = 13.47%

Percentage of Deaths per Motorcycle 3181 / 885000 = 0.00359 = 0.359%

Percentage of Deaths per Gun 31672 / 300000000 = 0.0001055 = 0.01055%


But we aren't Banning Doctors Nor are we trying to Ban Cars..
But they ***** more People than GUN's do...

Let me start this post by stating that I firmly believe we need moderators and guidelines on how to behave in this community. That said let me play the devils advocate for a moment.
(and pleas read the whole post before going all bonanza over what I write)

Why do we need moderators? Aren't their task just to censor free speech in this community?
(note: this is a rhetorical question)

Now, bare with me and remember English isn't my native language. (even if I'm pretty good at it *s*)

Just as the Team have set up guidelines on how members should behave in this community I find it natural for the Team to set up guidelines on how the models should behave in order for them to be safe and for Totem to earn as much money as possible.

REX posted above that in the beginning the girls had no guidance when it came to guns, and that resulted in some clips certain members found offensive. Me being one of them. If the Team now have set guidelines, concerning guns, for the girls to follow I think this is a good thing, just as I think it's a good idea to have guidelines and moderators for this community.

To go and yell censorship isn't a productive approach. Instead we should wait and see what these new guidelines really mean AND if we don't like the result raise our voice and ask for them to be changed. Just like the person starting this thread did by making a poll.

We are all here to enjoy the girls and personally I think the Team is doing a great job bringing us the most beautiful and charming girls to our desktops. Let's all try and remember that to keep things in perspective. =)

Keep Safe and Let the Ladies Dance!

//Jununger

Hum. There's no such thing as a "new" guidance. As Rex said: "It has been changed for a while now".

And if it was changed was cause someone, back in 2008, was crying for censorship out loud and demanded a clip with a gun to be deleted. Shockingly, but not for the only time, that someone was heard by Totem and here we are again, talking about restrictions and liberties, safety and political correctness in the surface, but just beating the old horse of "if I don't like it, nobody should see it".

As WA, I wonder what thing would be the subject of a "guideline" next. "Don't run with scissors" makes sense to me, "Be very careful holding a toy gun" makes not.

@Oq
I wonder, If these changes has been around "for a while now", why have no one cried out about this "censorship" before?

Oh, maybe because nothing has really changed? Or maybe the changes have been so subtle that no one has seen it... Don't go ***** wolf!

I don't think that this topic is very productive and has become less so as it went on.

So in the interest of peace and quiet I am closing it.