Take a look at this photo from the upcoming card of Verona Sky. Note that her face is in focus while the between the legs view is slightly out of focus. This happens quite often in the photo set. I'm no photographer; I assume the photographer has a choice as to which part of the photo should be in best focus.

For comparison, I have added a photo of Agatha Vega where the between the legs view is more in focus.

Question: For photos of this type, which part of the photo should be presented in clearest focus? I think the genitals should be presented more clearly, as there are always plenty of face views.

I would have made this a poll, but honestly I don't know how to do that.

@TallandSlimMan

I would prefer that photos like the first one not be a part of the photo set. I would prefer that all photos be in focus. If photos like the first one is published, the genitals should be "in focus" as the face is secondary in the photo. The Agatha Vega photo is more preferable in my opinion.

I would have made this a poll, but honestly I don't know how to do that.

To make a poll, see screenshot........

@JayZ971

Thanks for the tip!!

@JayZ971

Thanks for the tip!!

No problem @TallandSlimMan 😎

I Agree,
Depending on the true target of each photo taken. The focus should align as well.
Full flat views - full focus
Up close and personal - focus on target or reason for upclose shot
Sometimes a combination where one photo can follow another. Or up close parts in many cases.

Otherwise, would there be a need for a 3D photo? Or a hologram?

In the photo the genitals should be in focus. Often many photographers will be using not only the wronf f stop and get the wrong DOF but they are not aware which part of the frame has the active focus.

I expect better.

So, since I hope the Totem photographer is a pro, and this is by choice, I would really like them to stop this nonsense!

A professional photographer knows how to create depth and focus both up close and further away using a combination of light, aperture and shutter speed to ***** the image depth. To be honest I'm often VERY disappointed with the image quality... and having been around since the time of Stanzeflasher I've seen a drastic decline in quality in the recent years.

Please Totem.... Give instructions to your professional photographer to make sure the whole model is in focus... and not just a small portion of her body... as it is now it looks like an amateur using the camera on All Automatic and that sucks!

I agree with topic creator.

Btw: Imagesets here on iStripper are not interesting for me, because the white background is boring af. There are many other sites that offer very nice sets with interesting locations.

I agree! I'd also add that it's a huge no no, to have bits of toilet paper stuck to their pussy & DIRTY FEET! (I've seen both, the former to many times!)
High quality photos show everything really, really well...(obviously!)
💕🐱✌😎

Btw: Imagesets here on iStripper are not interesting for me, because the white background is boring af. There are many other sites that offer very nice sets with interesting locations.

You can always add you own backgrounds or even just play around with filters on the original photos. It can make them far more interesting.

@Number6

Good work! But don't make us guess which shows the pics are from. 😋

A professional photographer knows how to create depth and focus both up close and further away using a combination of light, aperture and shutter speed to ***** the image depth. To be honest I'm often VERY disappointed with the image quality... and having been around since the time of Stanzeflasher I've seen a drastic decline in quality in the recent years.

Please Totem.... Give instructions to your professional photographer to make sure the whole model is in focus... and not just a small portion of her body... as it is now it looks like an amateur using the camera on All Automatic and that sucks!

Well said @jununger 👍