Why are some girls who lie down pleasuring themselves looking so deformed? Look at the like the example in the picture. Her head is in the back and it looks way to big... Like there are 2 separate layers one for the body and one for the head, and the one for the head iz zoomed in like 120%

No but seriously, take a good look at this and tell me how natural does it look? She almost looks like a caricature of herself, you know the typical ones with big heads? Click on the picture to see it better. I don't know perhaps it's just about the angle, but it looks defnitely weird, unnatural to me.

And she's not even the only one, where I've noticed this phenomena...

I also noticed on some other card, another girl had obviously streched proportions, like her height was 90% and width was like 110% or something... but I can't remeber now which one was it.

Yeh, almost like a telephoto lens has been used rather than a prime.

For me, it's like a low-angle shot to enforce the face in the background.

so it's not just my imagination... It's really distracting.

It really is apparent when you play them on a real life background. It's just another factor putting me off buying more in the future.

It really is apparent when you play them on a real life background.

@meStripper

I find that wallpapers with landscapes or other real life pics only work when the perspective matches, at least approximately. I use Vue (3D landscape generator software) to create backgrounds and an image where the floor rises to the centre of the pic looks wrong. This is because iS clips are filmed with the camera fixed at the level of the model's feet, so the stage is invisible, with a long lens to improve proportion in vertical figures. So you have to select your real life image.

Pick images wher the pov is at floor level and which have ben taken with a telephoto. Then iS images will look right.

Alternatively, pick images with a minimum of floor showing or cut the floor out. Long shot landscapes are best. I can post a couple of Vue wallpapers if you want. One advantage of DIY backgrounds is that you aren't trying to produce a complete composition - it's designed to have a figure stuck in, so you can leave a big chunk of sky in the middle.

And, as for the big head problem described by @rageinblack , I don't think there's anything we can do about it. Anyway, it's not really wrong, it's just a long lens, where most porn is done using ludicrously wide angle lenses from a close-up pov.

As @pantalone says, its not a *****. It is perhaps more accurately described as a lack of ***** being noticed due to people being more used to the ***** comonly present in porn closeups - and which is being exacerbated by a perspective mismatch with the background image. I certainly do not notice it with the backgrounds I tend use.

Ha!
I can just hear it...

You are busy lapping at the promise land.
you look up and see your woman in the moment.
and you Say,
"OMFG, your Head looks so Big !"

Carck! goes your Skull
as she Clamps her thighs around your head.

I do notice when porn has a fish-eye lens to make those bubble butts, and sometimes is very subtle but noticeable... But Most porn that I watch doesn't even use it.

Wyldanimal@ That's because in real life it does not look like that, only on istripper cameras....

Is it just me or are we getting an increasing number of self proclaimed "experts" in this forum lately ???

real life it does not look like that

...but it does! Try it yourself. Get a young woman - any one will do, strip her off and stick her on a table. With your nashers 2in from her bits, her head occupies very, very little of your visual field and her thighs look huge. Well maybe her thighs are huge, but you should have been more selective. Do try to concentrate.

Then stand in the corner of the room. fifteen feet away and stare at her through a cardboard tube. The centre of a roll of toilet paper will do. Thighs don't dominate, head occupies more of the visual field. Looks bigger. That's all a long lens does.

You'll need to think of a way of explaining yourself to the people who come to take you away - tell 'em a self-proclaimed expert told you to do it.

@Rageinblack - It doesn't need anything like fisheye lens to get the *****, just any closeup with a reasonably normal wide angle lens - the camera would have to be within inches of the model to require a fisheye. You need a wide angle lens if you are close up for this sort of shot otherwise you ony see a part of what you are looking at (unless of course you only want to look at that part in detail) and this automatically makes the more distant parts appear smaller. If you are photographing someone from far away then to a good approximation all part of the subject are the same distance from the lens and there is essentially no ***** of the kind we are talking about. It is all very basic geometrical optics. The clips do not look like close up shots because they are not close up shots - they look exactly as you should expect from a more distant shot.

@91hebasu - on this subject you do not need to be an expert to understand what is going on. It is just the normal rules of perspective as known to artists and scientists since the time of Leonardo da Vinci or earlier. It was certainly taught in both basic art and science classes when I was at school and it ought to be familiar to anyone who has done anything even slightly serious with a camera - even if all that has sunk in is that things look different in close up views.

Well all I can say is...
If you're in the Middle of lapping her up and you look up and chuckle,
because in the back of your mind you are thinking about the thread.

FOR GAWDS SAKE, Don't tell her why you chuckled.
make something up...

I got a tickle in my nose....
Something, anything
Don't tell her, Her Head looks TOO BIG!
HA!

I wasn't implying they used a fish-eye lens. It's ok tho. lol.