Age Verification
This website contains age-restricted material including nudity and explicit content. By entering, you confirm being at least 18 years old or the age of majority in the jurisdiction you are accessing the website from.
Our parental controls page explains how you can easily block access to this site.
0
video quality Forum / Spazio nuovi utenti
3heart
Da In Jan 2008 5 post(s)
January 30, 2008
I think the video quality is not bad but not excellent. I don't think it's an HD which is 1080i. The full size one is just a zoom of the small one but same resolution. Hope to have the real HD quality and the full size could be another 25% bigger.
Aliena12
Da In Jan 2008 18 post(s)
January 30, 2008 (edited)
I strongly support the idea of bigger full size shows. Imho the largest sequences of the existing shows should become the standard size. Hell... when i zoom them in, i dont care about the space for other stuff on my monitor ;).
Aliena.
Aliena.
sarahisbad
Da In Jan 2008 1 post(s)
January 31, 2008
but friends we have members here those have dial up connections. what is the solution for them?
January 31, 2008
I believe that the native resolution is 800 pixels. The full size is a native 1-1 mapping.
Note: The full 800 pixels includes space for raised arms.
Note: Known bug, in a pole dance, when a model stretches to the top, or waves clothes or throws them off screen in an arc that goes above 800 pixels the top couple of pixels are stretched to the top of the screen resolution.
The small mode is compressed/information is dropped.
Note: The full 800 pixels includes space for raised arms.
Note: Known bug, in a pole dance, when a model stretches to the top, or waves clothes or throws them off screen in an arc that goes above 800 pixels the top couple of pixels are stretched to the top of the screen resolution.
The small mode is compressed/information is dropped.
jununger
Da In Oct 2007 1250 post(s)
January 31, 2008
SexyAgent is spot on with the size of the animations, 800px. I don't know if the digital camera record at a higher resolution but even if it were possible to go all the way to 1080 I don't know if it's wise to do so. They already have problems with people ***** about the CPU/Graphic usage and the minimum requirements would be even higher if they went "Full HD".
Personally I have a desktop computer I bought about a year ago with on board graphics. The software use 100% CPU almost all the time when I run the shows in full mode... and I can forget about doing anything else on the computer at the same time!
Instead of more pixels, I believe the next step is to allow for zoom in full mode above 100%.
Personally I have a desktop computer I bought about a year ago with on board graphics. The software use 100% CPU almost all the time when I run the shows in full mode... and I can forget about doing anything else on the computer at the same time!
Instead of more pixels, I believe the next step is to allow for zoom in full mode above 100%.
Non sei ancora autorizzato a partecipare
Come utente gratuito iStripper, non ti è consentito rispondere a un argomento nel forum o creare un nuovo argomento
Ma potrai accedere alle categorie e ai concetti di base ed entrare in contatto con la nostra comunità.!