Just a suggestion.
It's been mentioned before that there isn't a way to let others know about imperfections. Realizing that these are human beings and of course making issues is not only rude with a risk of being offensive to them, it could also damage the sales for the model and the company.
However if this isn't an issue, how about adding the uploading pictures programing to the comments page, limiting the images to one and filtering some images.
This would enable members to upload an image of moles, and bad skin marks, or odd boob jobs.
So if members are put off by this, they can be forewarned?
See examples

I would agree that there is a risk of offending someone, simply because she doesn't meet with our subjective demands about her appearance. However, allowing us to see an overview of pictures would allow us to make up our own minds, without having to post messages about a particular girl. I'm not comfortable doing that, and I won't here.

We choose a card precisely because it meets with our - personal - likings. However, there are cards that I wouldn't have gotten, had I been given a chance to review a general overview of their un-altered photos. For that matter, the fact that VG feels the need to alter photos seems to be an admission that they are attempting to hide something from us, that might affect our purchasing decision.

I'll leave it at that.

P.S. I want to add this comment. What I posted, earlier, isn't a reflection of my overall thoughts about VG. I'm very happy with my VG experience - and with the wonderful quality of their service and girls.

my view is that it should be up to the individual model concerned as to whether blemishes are covered up or not in pictures or shows. if they want to be made up or airbrushed to hide something they are not happy with which affects their confidence that is up to them.

i personally prefer to see natural blemishes such as birthmarks, moles and the odd pimple etc. as it is more attractive to me than layers of bronzer, fake tan or caked on makeup hiding them.

Would you rather not see human girls than barbies?
And some of those "blemishes" are actually marks from the Floor

You're right. To be a model - it's not an easy job at all. Very ***** some times.
So can we judge them by their appearance?

Interesting.
I just seeing what people think.
Everyone to their own, some people like the worts and all idea.
The first image shows an abundance of pimples, the second, is very bad ***** or something else, I don't think it's a mark from the floor, the third is where the Surgeon has inserted the implants.
As I said everyone to their own, as long as it doesn't do *****.
For what it's worth, I think that glamor and fantasy hasn't much to do with reality. it's like listening to the radio, you make your own pictures up, once the program is transfered to TV, it loses something. So yes, in this situation I'd rather the Barbies to the worts and all.
Unfortunately in this circumstance I think it appropriate to judge by appearance. They are selling a product, if we like what we SEE we buy it. It's completely different to actually intending to know someone, in which case looks don't come into it, as for friendship you don't judge a book by it's cover. Think about it, how many cards would be sold if the models had missing limbs, or something terrible like Parkingson's, or really huge birth marks, I don't mean the little ones, were wheelchair users. These people must be treated the same.
In this case, we aren't talking anything other than selfish, one sided indulgence.
But as I said everyone too their own, please don't shot me.
Sorry.

Birthmarks, freckles and moles are different from: acne, *****, surgical scars, clothing impressions (bra marks, etc.), floor rash and carpet *****, which are temporary conditions.

Some girls always seem to be *****. I have no problem bringing them into the studio in that condition, because that's who they are; they ***** easily or play rough or both, and their windows of clear skin are too brief to schedule.

But surgical scars and pimples heal, become invisible. Personally, I'd wait until then, whether I was model or videographer. Professionally, I'd go ahead and do the shoot because there is an audience for it. There is an audience for everything!

Totem does a great job of presenting all types of girls and conditions (well, no visibly pregnant dancer - yet). It's up to the consumer sort out what they like, and don't. Totem can't very well ***** about the complexion of a model they just paid handsomely. That would be counterproductive to the bottom line.

So it's up to us, the customers, to develop, maintain and publicize a database of faults. Totem provides us with the means and opportunity, and thanks to Zoony we now have a thread to build upon.

I'm not inclined to post pix of blemished bottoms, but will list my personal issues, so that members who LIKE scars and ***** can seek the shows, and others can avoid them. It will be a separate post.


:)

Its a Floor mark (Trust me it appears part way into a show and isn't there earlier on a couple of the Ladies I have seen it happen)
Turning in place while resting on the floor creates it.

As to the comment about worts and all (think you mean Warts "worts" means "leafed herbal plants" usually) Not seen any Warts.
But people are people so could you not live with one ??

As to missing limbs
Well there are models (including Glamour models) missing limbs.
So clearly its possible in the future.
Im sure there are members here who are missing a limb or are in chairs as well.
A lot of the population (especially ex military) have A disability now.

It would be Very difficult to pole dance with a wheel chair but in the future ?
Who knows.