go to the girl
on play button "right click" - play all clips
now scenes are played in order

you don't want previews
select (all) models
at bottum "right click" on delete: delete previews only

first - full screen only select "Bare Elegance".
then:
go to the model
play the model
right click - full screen

but if th model has no pole clips she can not do a pole dance in "Bare Elegance" than an other model take over.

in the full screen you can use the "arrow right" and "arrow down" keys for other models (with pole lips)

How do I control the state of undress of my models as they go through their routines? I much prefer to see them with as much clothing as their routine calls for and have them get more and more nude as the dance goes on. Then have them finish with the sexualy explicit stuff. Just like they would at an actual strip club.

Thanks @mkst. 😊

Merci @mkst. 😊

I see Totem had double-down on "you paid us money alraedy? See ya!" approach. One of the reasons I stopped spending money here. First "surprise mechanics" to make sure collectors have to gamble to have full collection, now expecting people to pay twice for the same show just to view it on a different media. I found out the hard way today.

And brown-nosers are still strong and convicing people that spit in their face is actually rain. Nothing changed. So yeah..."See ya, Totem!"

Je suis du même avis: trop de filles d'Ukraine 😎

Certains parlent de réécrire les livres d'histoires pour les rendre plus inclusifs et du coup iStripper pourrait en faire de même pour ses castings.

Vous avez raison, @Stealthdoze, beaucoup de modèles viennent de ce pays et des alentours. Beaucoup trop a mon gout lorsque l'on préfère un autre type de fille 😪

You are right, @Stealthdoze, a lot of models are from this country and around. Too much for my taste when you prefer another type of girl 😪

They always put me in a good mood.

One in particular for me. 💛💙😘

I hope you did not see my first attempt to answer your post because it was wrong - as indeed, to a lesser degree was my second.

I think your problem is not understanding the full generality of for loops.

In the compound statement

for ( e1; e2; e3 ) { loop body };

the expressions e1, e2 and e3 may be just abount any expressions, though usually they are quite simple. The expression e1 is evaluated only once. e2 is evaluated every time the loop executes and controls when the loop exits and e3 is likewise evaluted every time the loop executes but has no special meaning (though it is usually used to increment a variable used by e2). In effect e3 is the last statement of the loop body and could indeed be placed there.

I do not know why the code has been written in the way it has. It is valid but very unusual to use e3 in this way - normally it is used as part of the "loop control" logic in order to distinguish loop control from loop body.

The way in which e2 has been written. ++i<99 is also unusual as it is both incrementing the loop counter, i, and testing it.

I would replace this obfuscated code with a "normal" for loop

for(float i=0.,g=0.,e,s; i<99.; i+=1.0)
{
...other stuff
O.xyz+=5e-5*abs(cos(vec3(3,2,1)+log(s*9.)))/dot(p,p)/e
}

though I would first check that this transformation exactly corresponds to the original. Without checking I am not sure if they execute the loop body 98, 99 or 100 times - but I suspect that in this particular piece of code that does not matter and that something in the "other stuff" actually controls when the loop is to exit either by a conditional goto, return or by setting i to 99 or 100 or some other large value.

Hi @all

I'm trying to convert this shader by "gaz":
https://www.shadertoy.com/view/wtGfRy

I've been able to convert a few similar ones from gaz but some have a section of code like this:

for(float i=0.,g=0.,e,s;
++i<99.;
O.xyz+=5e-5*abs(cos(vec3(3,2,1)+log(s*9.)))/dot(p,p)/e
)
{
...other stuff
}

The existence of this line:

O.xyz+=5e-5*abs(cos(vec3(3,2,1)+log(s*9.)))/dot(p,p)/e

is the root of the problem and I am unable to convert any in this style

I'm used to "for loops" where each loop runs the code in the block {} but I "think" this is returning the value of O.xyz independant of the block..... that is to say, it's beyond me to convert it. Does anyone know if/how to convert this ?

When I started collecting the models mostly came from Czechoslovakia/The Czech Republic, Prior to that it seems that they mainly came from western Europe with the change occuring when it became easy for eastern European models to work in France - maybe this was when the countries joined the EU, maybe a little earlier. The reason for the shift to the east was, I am almost certain, driven largely by the price.

Latter, as the Czech cost of living rose, it became less advantageous to hire models based there - but this was followed by a special arrangement between Russia and Ukraine with the EU to allow both Russians and Ukranians to work in Europe with little or no difficulties with respect to visa and work permits. At this time Totem switched to mainly recruiting models from thise two countries - this was explicitly stated by Totem in a post to this Forum.

So, the reason is a mixture of maodel availability and price.

Some of my favourite models are from the Ukraine, and nearly all are from the former Eastern bloc. No wonder you like them :D

They always put me in a good mood.

Because it's a country where the models are beautiful and they will work for less than those in Western Europe.

Why are a lot of the models on iStripper from Ukraine?

@wrightsayswow I really appreciate the effort 👍 I know you had to retake her class, and it must have been very difficult to stay focused on your review with such a distracting teacher! 😆
I'll use a joker, it's what I was hoping for. Thanks again!

There is also another thread that is open here

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/52477/1?post=758663

The company has explained the reason, a list of impacted shows was included in those threads and the individual cards have a note on the details page. If you have bought any of those cards and you are dissasatisfied, please contact Customer Services.

So to avoid duplication, I am closing this thread down.

There was a problem but hopefully it won't be happening again. There was a fairly long thread about it.

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/52322/2?post=758025

Is it just me,or has thee been a lot of "Camea Issues" lately. Previously cards would recieve a small discount when there was a technical or equipment issue that affected a card. This policy seems to have changed. I would like Totem to considr reinstating this policy. Firstly it would incentivise their staf to pay closer attention to quality and quality assurance. And secondly it would show us loyal members that they appriciate us and understand that our resources are limited and that they value our continued support. I don't think we shoud be expeted to pay full price for products that Totem themselves admit is not up to their usual high standards. A one off would be ok, even two or three would be okay. But not so many. There must be Ten recent and upcoming crds with "issues."

For full screen scenes there is, in general, a primary performer and one or more secondary performers. The primary performer is simply the one corresponding to the first "clip" node mentioned in the scene's .scn file and this, in a well constructed scene, will be the "main" performer with the others, if any, taking on secondary, background, roles. However, not all scenes are "well written" in this sense so the "primary" performers as far as the program is concerned may visually only have a secondary role.

The scenes provided by Totem, such as the Bare Elegance club scenes are well written.

When selecting which clips to use for the primary performer the program first of all considers the cards that are in the Now Playing sidebar's Next area, when it has run out of those it then considers any of your collection which are "enabled". However, when considering a card that card only those clips that match the "allow", "deny" and "category" criteria specified in the scene's .scn file. For example a scene may require standing clips and will therefore not play any table clips (or vice versa) so if a card has no suitable clips it will not be used.

So, for the "primary" performer you can best speciy which cards t use by pre-loading the Now Playing/Next area - which you can do either directly or by using a playlist - and optionally ticking the "repeat" box at the bottom of the Now Playing sidebar.

For the secondary performers in a scene the Now Playing/Next area is ignored and the only control you have, other than modifying the .scn file itself) is to enable/disable cards on your "My Collection" page.

If you have a dual screen set-up then you can configure iStripper to play fullscreen scenes on one screen and the GUI on the other. You can then ***** a card from My Collection to the Now Playing/Now Playing area while a scene is active. If you do this that card will immedately replace the primary performer in the scene if it has any suitable clips.

@ezromeo
If you select a show with no pole dance clip, this scene can't be played. In the script of the scenes, there is a line to allow or deny some clips :

clip {
id: RightGirl
allow: pole
nameGlowColor: 1, 1, 1
}

Here is a piece of the code of the Bare Elegance scene. You can see the line "allow: pole" so, only the pole clip are playable in this scene.
The scenes are stored in the Data folder of the software, by default here c:\Users\Your username\AppData\Local\vghd\Data\scenes and the code is located in the .scn file (it's a text file readable with the notepad).

To link the shows with a scene, you can make a playlist with all the shows you want and play this list with the scene you want.

I need to know how to pair my selected model with my selected scene. I want my models to dance in the "Bare Elegance" scene; but I can't find how to make that happen. If I choose my model first, then select the scene, I get a randimly selected model dancing in the scene.
I know that it is a "nubbie" question;but I need some help.

@arise77 I added a detailed comment to the card. So up to you now if you decide to join her class. 😉

Yes!!!!!!!!!!👍👍👍😍😍😍🔥🔥🔥

@batavus agreed. If this card could be bought, I would buy it.

@arise77

Now I see it's a SEC

@wrightsayswow that's it. thanks for taking the time to answer and to check.
Cheers 😊

@smith2 's

All Scenes are Here
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1tE7yXj74qvZ1pr2jC4f2O29Bre763H7p

Many thanks @wrightsayswow ! 👍😉❤️So are the standing & pole clips all heels? I'm guessing the table ones are bare feet.

Not sure tbh. I just took the info from the card. She's not actually one of my fav models, but I'll do a quick check and get back to you tomorrow. Late here now and I need some sleep.
I understand of course, if you have a joker, you want to use it wisely.
Before I had all the SECs I also had to think carefully about which to get first.

@batavus agreed. If this card could be bought, I would buy it.

If you're really interested in that card, you would buy it, no matter what.

I second that, Swood, but don't see it happening. The SECs are probably their biggest money makers.

Many thanks @wrightsayswow ! 👍😉❤️
So are the standing & pole clips all heels? I'm guessing the table ones are bare feet.

@arise77 here you go. 👍
#1 Standing - No nudity - Preview 30s
#2 Pole - No nudity - Preview 29s
#3 Table - No nudity - Preview 15s
#4 Standing - Full nudity 3m59s
#5 Pole - Full nudity 3m59s
#6 Standing - Full nudity 1m21s
#7 Pole - Full nudity 1m08s
#8 Table - Sexually Explicit 6m24s
#9 Table - Sexually Explicit 6m19s
#10 Table - Sexually Explicit 6m02s
#11 Table - SexuallyExplicit 6m24s

@Socialhazard thanks for your reply. I already had a look at Lukasz' showroom before posting, only additional info there is that there are 11 clips. Nothing in the clip detail section unfortunately.

You can find some of that info here:

https://www.isworkshop.eu/index.php?p=show&id=f0751

Hi everyone,
Since this is a special event card, would anyone who owns it be kind enough to share the clip details?
More precisely, how many of the 11 clips are standing / pole / table? And in which clips is she bare feet / wearing heels?
Thanks! 😊

Smith2_Red_Mirror (V5.1)http://dl.free.fr/getfile.pl?file=/FHSuWrcgIssue to fixe shadow bug (pole girl)

Please reupload your scene, all links are broken. Do someone have copy of it?

@mkst Pretty cool. 👍 😎

Thanks! 😎

@mkst

Pretty cool. 👍 😎

Dorm Room scenes 😊
https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1mnAXqqLE-k5JqZ683NbC7M0hK30LXgMZ
(mkst - Dorm Room 20230312 1130.zip)

Would love to get SECs in the roulette

Annie - Kitten In Tulle - e1838 - iStripper
Kirke - Rouge Passion - e1829 - iStripper
Sharon White - Kitchen Assistance - f1269 - iStripper XXX
Candice - Sashaying Through Summer - e1808 - iStripper
Alissa Foxy - Just Call Me Cute - f1242 - iStripper XXX
Kelly Collins - Essence Of Blue - e1825 - iStripper
Candice Demellza - Red Sails In The Sunset - f1253 - iStripper XXX
Neesa - Spring Party, Party, Party ! - e1854 - iStripper

The Wheel of Bargains & the Progressive Redraw both look like a great way to save on cards (now that there are plenty in the store for me to choose from again). Thank you, Totem for adding a sane way to save on cards where each spin is only one credit. Please, please, PLEASE run these events frequently i their exact same format.

What about SEC cards & Jokers though? I'm certain they'll never appear in one of these games as they are now, but would it be possibly to narrow the selection of possible SECs down to 3 or 4 with a Joker added for one credit spins to select the possible cards so that a person would be gambling for in the gambling events? That way the player could set his own limit on how much he was willing to lose on the cards he wanted to gamble for, and if he didn't get the one he was trying for on, let's on a say a 10 token spin, some random cards could be added to the drawn cards and the player would have the option to buy at the regular price, minus the ten credits spent on the spin.

That way the player would have spent however many one credit spins until the SEC he wanted or a Joker appeared in the special pool, plus the ten credits for the spin, plus the price differential. This way, Totem would make an increased profit on every card the player purchases from the game, and once a player reaches his gambling ceiling, at least he'd have something to show for it. And the player having a chance to win the ten credits back (or more) on each ten credit spin would sweeten ther deal. If there other unpurchased cards in his store, at least every spin would only be a few token loss if he was looking to build his collection back AND possibly add his deired SEC or Joker. I remember how some of the customer base here was saying they'd come out ahead in credits, or end up paying less for the SECs than they would have for a normal card after all was said and done. I suppose that doesn't apply to the full collection guys who have been Totem's longest and most loyal players. It seemed like the joke was on us, and that's why I actually debated within mysel before reinstalling the software after returning from computer issues.

My love of Lucie T and some of the other girls drove me back. Bummer that her bonus stuff and application images are gone now, :( Anyway, It's good to see that there are still great ways to cheaply build my collection back to full if I so decide, though I doubt I'll do that now since the gambling options always seem to favor the guys who do not have full collections. TBH, that was one of the things that had actually soured me to iStripper in the past when I was one of the "collectors" trying to get all of the cards to keep a full collection. It seems to me that depriving collectors of certain cards is a ***** thing to do. But I guess feeding off our vices is too profitable for Totem, because apparently they were unable to make enough money begore introducing gambling (even though I saW Rex bragging on one of the industry blogs that he was bigger than Husltler in terms of annual profit, long before the hooked collector's lust for new cards was an incentive to add gambling. It seemed identical to me to what ***** dealers do... but that's just me. The odds of winning a SEC really need to be published, but I guess France's gambling laws govern how that works.

Anyway, end of rant, but I truly am grateful that building my collection back for much more cheaply than what I paid in the past (minus new cards and SECs) are an option again. But, knowing my love of collecting stuff, and not just porn and vghd cards, I know it might become too obsessive if I did that.
.
.
.

TL/DR? Just a word of thanks for the new ways (to me) to get cards cheaply, as well as an idea for gambling where the player could narrow his pool of SECs and still have a way to buy cards at an elevated cost (a consolation prize). plus my rant which I couldn't resist. Anyway, I'm sure my grievances have been hashed/rehashed in my *****, so I made a way to bitch along with all of the other unhappy customers and disillusioned long time full collection whales who are the biggest losers in these gambling games.

Yes, I agree with squirting being explicit. Melena Maria Rya had a few with such. She had one card when she wore black heels and stockings for the most part but at the last stripped them, oiled up her legs and feet and did a foot job on a dildo. Not sure if she also squirted on that one. Time constraints won't allow me to look for it now but perhaps I will later.

Wow

Yes😍

Some might consider the shows with squirting a bit explicit.

I had the same thoughts. Carolina Abril is one of my favourites for this.

Wow

Some might consider the shows with squirting a bit explicit.
that is its own category so no need to mention the individual models.

This one sort of has solo fisting by the way. So if your building a collection or something.



And this one has some panty stuffing.

Duplicated thread. Go there to continue https://www.istripper.com/fr/forum/thread/52581/1?post=759663

I close this one.