Looks like a ***** so I don't disparage the low ratings but a stunning girl, who can dance a bit, who has some of the lowest ratings on the site, based on a script.

The tattoos says "Mentirosa" and "Manipuladora" ... oh the irony.

😂

Liar and *****.

Possibly best in a while with a nice phat ass. Juicy. I gave 5 stars.

My comment on her show a few minutes ago:

My advise at any commenter: look careful, there are NO scars; the red inkt is a tattoo. The breasts of Agatha are total natural. Agatha makes a very good debut!!!

Total 18 clips divided in Standing 6, Pole 6 and On TB 6. Some touching/rubbing in TB clips. No Bare feet. Starting Nude (just heels) one Standing, one Pole and one TB clip.

I knew Agatha from partnersite W4B, were she made her debut three years ago without any tattoo. A year later she had her first tattoo (our solar system on her back) and
the nipple piercings. Again a year later the breast tattoos were put on in red ink with the words “montirosa” and “manipuladora”. Superficially seen one can think it are scars,
but they are not. Her breasts are natural!!! The socalled sleeve on her underarm is the most recent one. Agatha has a soft, friendly face and her shapes are curvaceous, what
declares the title of this show. Her figure has the right proportions. No skinnyness here. The dress was beautiful, just as the high heels and the lace panties. At certain moments
a breast peeped out above the dress.

Agatha does a show mostly in the slower striptease style. So you have all the time to watch her curved body with her wide pelvis and her well developped butt. Her contact with
the camera is good and she smiles more then enough. At times her movements are squiggly. In the TB clips Agatha laughs slyly and is not shy. Perfect views on that ass/butt/bum.

The rating: Standing 4,5 (slower striptease style, squiggly), Pole 4,5 (learning fase, does her very best), Taskbar 5 (laughs slyly, not shy), Beauty 5 (friendly face, curved body) and
Outfit 5 (very nice dress and heels). Total 24/5 = 4,8-->5 stars. A good debut show of Agatha, but underrated by commenters/raters, who took a tattoo for a *****. NATURAL BREASTS!
------------------
As Music of the Show not a specific song, but all the music of the famous Venezuelan musician Oscar D’Leon. Before my retirement as teacher I once asked my female students
from the Dutch Antilles: “What is good Latin music?” One of the musicians they advised me, was Oscar D’Leon and so I learned from my students! “Mulate Coquete” is a good one.

a stunning girl, who can dance a bit, who has some of the lowest ratings on the site, based on a script.

This could summarize the rating system 😖

In this case it is not the system's fault. It's the fault of a bunch of mor... - ekhm, "users" - who mistook tattoos for scars.

Hey! You! Yes, you @user, If you're reading this, if you're one of those "users" and you've taken it personally, well, that's your problem.

And yes! I was one of those "users" too 😆

In this case it is not the system's fault. It's the fault of a bunch of mor... - ekhm, "users" - who mistook tattoos for scars.

Ratings are made by users... so it's precisely what I too did try to point 😉

People who took that tattoo as a ***** need to have their eyes examined.

@orclover Thanks for starting this thread. It's so unright what has happened to Agatha.

I too used to get upset about the rating/voting system until the team posted their year end review of the best selling cards of 2019 and realized those scores have no great relevance on total sells.

Bad Barbie's card has a overall score of 4.16*
Kay J's card 4.37*
any others in the 4.4 only one card tops 4.8

I wouldn't pay "to much" attention to the rating scale.

I too used to get upset about the rating/voting system until the team posted their year end review of the best selling cards of 2019 and realized those scores have no great relevance on total sells.

Bad Barbie's card has a overall score of 4.16*
Kay J's card 4.37*
any others in the 4.4 only one card tops 4.8

I wouldn't pay "to much" attention to the rating scale.

There was a thread about this a while ago but in reality the rating system is too basic and too open to being used to express people's personal agendas. If they don't like XXX, rate a nudity-only card low - and vice versa.

Until a more scientific objective approach is implemented,it will always not be worth the paper it's not printed on 😄

In the meantime, when I first saw the tattoos I thought "huh!" but it took me all of around 5 seconds to realise they couldn't be scars. Agatha has a fabulous figure and high potential - my only regret about her card was that she wore a dress like that and didn't do a single pantyless upskirt - now that is a hanging offence!

😉😉😉

I knew from pics on Lukaszr's fine site that the breast tats were not scars. In my opinion, they are also not attractive.

All tattoos are scars in my view.

At Agatha's back a tattoo with our solar system: above the Sun, then Mercurius, Venus and Earth with the South-American continent showing! Her home continent!👍

I too used to get upset about the rating/voting system until the team posted their year end review of the best selling cards of 2019 and realized those scores have no great relevance on total sells.

Bad Barbie's card has a overall score of 4.16*
Kay J's card 4.37*
any others in the 4.4 only one card tops 4.8

I wouldn't pay "to much" attention to the rating scale.

Imagine being a new user though...you literally have thousands of cards to choose from..each costs $2.50, which is a lot for 45 minutes of non-b/g porn. Ratings are key to getting somebody "hooked", in fact I went from 10 cards to hundreds based off of a now-defunct site that clearly rated every single card. Of course it is just one card but inevitably people are going to ignore the rest of hers thinking she has red scars.

Within a set of cards the ratings are surprisengly trustworthy. Most scores below 4.6 are cards that are either boring, have physical, or technical flaws...scores above this tend to maximize what the girl has to offer...so you may not like the girl but a high rating means she is physically and technically well represented.

Take Belka's 1st xxx card. To many, the most highly anticipated card in a long time. It barely has a rating of 4.6...that is much lower than her entire first set that were all above 4.7. I could immediately look at that rating an know the card must be a let down because Belka doing xxx should be an automatic 5...except it doesn't maximize Belka, and people rated it lower.

Hey guys relax! I’ll take the blame for the ***** comment!
Downloaded, Played the show, didn’t Bother to look😵 closely, Jumped to a Bad conclusion.
I commented Favorably about Agatha’s show , regardless was corrected-thankfully by another member.
Agatha did the trick for me!! Yeah! She’s a Keeper!

Please don’t get your Panties in a Bunch over this
Sheesh✌

I love tattoos so I see this as an win

@orclover Reacting on your comment on her show: Agatha Vega has done 8 movies for W4B and 4 for Nubiles. So she's used to the camera and not shy or inexperienced. I don't known anything about the chemistry between her and the director.
The show with this dress is taken on her first day in the studio. The inviting for the fansign is on the first day.
More info here: https://www.thenude.eu/Agatha%20Vega_41079.htm#videos

No thanks for me @Missy?😳

Someone should have asked...

mentirosa manipuladora

***** liar

lying manipulator

Also the name of an Alblum / song
https://play.google.com/music/preview/Tqblehzm4u5267qb6flkfxkf2ie

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfqLjGAT4HI

Ok that must be her jam 😊

I wonder if it was played in the studio 😶

Yep! She sure got me!!
You Evil Woman
You Tease!
You Lying Manipulator!
Yeaaahhh Baby!
I’m Yours!

I too used to get upset about the rating/voting system until the team posted their year end review of the best selling cards of 2019 and realized those scores have no great relevance on total sells.

Bad Barbie's card has a overall score of 4.16*
Kay J's card 4.37*
any others in the 4.4 only one card tops 4.8

I wouldn't pay "to much" attention to the rating scale.

If I remember correctly there was a card that was marked/scored quite low and had nothing to do with the woman.
It was a Christmas card, but was more of a new years eve card.
all the negative comments were about it not being christmas.

If I remember correctly there was a card that was marked/scored quite low and had nothing to do with the woman.
It was a Christmas card, but was more of a new years eve card.
all the negative comments were about it not being christmas.

That was the SEC f0428 Olivia Sin / Happy New Year

@orclover Reacting on your comment on her show: Agatha Vega has done 8 movies for W4B and 4 for Nubiles. So she's used to the camera and not shy or inexperienced. I don't known anything about the chemistry between her and the director.
The show with this dress is taken on her first day in the studio. The inviting for the fansign is on the first day.
More info here: https://www.thenude.eu/Agatha%20Vega_41079.htm#videos

All I can say is she blushes continually from embarrassment, and is always looking off the to the side for direction. This is not unusual recently though so I think something is going on with direction. None of the recent girls including the starlets look like they are freely performing. Even a girl like Carolina who has sex in front of hundreds of people on stage seemed uncomfortable at times. It does appear as if the later cards get better just from the demos so maybe just nerves...the istripper experience is very different from those other sites.

Imagine being asked to perform but there are no cuts and there is no post-production to fix mistakes. Everything that is filmed will be public. W4B and Nubiles do set pieces, so if a girl does a squat or a shake, or splits it can be set up separately from the rest of the performance. And there is no pole which causes some stress on the girls if they aren't pros. ALso performing in on a set with a couch or normal setting has got be more relaxing than a stripper stage with industrial lighting.

Maybe totem should bring in a few hundred people to be a crowd for the performances...in my public speaking experiences...many was always easier to navigate than just a few.

I can imagine how different the experience at iStripper is, compared to more structured and directed sets. It seems clear that the performers here have to do the choreaography themselves, instructions being "okay, there's your stage, dance and perform for 35 minutes and try and look sexy" :)

Based on recent shows, i don't think girls get much instructions or direction from the production team, which is a shame I guess, but rather they are given free range to do what they feel comfortable doing... Maybe this affected Agatha's performance, too?

And for the record, I loved Agatha's show! The shyness and not-100%-professionalism is exactly what I want to see. Spontaneous decisions, choices made in the spur of the moment, little clumsiness and ***** mishaps... all of that makes the show even more precious to me.

I can imagine how different the experience at iStripper is, compared to more structured and directed sets. It seems clear that the performers here have to do the choreaography themselves, instructions being "okay, there's your stage, dance and perform for 35 minutes and try and look sexy" :)

Based on recent shows, i don't think girls get much instructions or direction from the production team, which is a shame I guess, but rather they are given free range to do what they feel comfortable doing... Maybe this affected Agatha's performance, too?

And for the record, I loved Agatha's show! The shyness and not-100%-professionalism is exactly what I want to see. Spontaneous decisions, choices made in the spur of the moment, little clumsiness and ***** mishaps... all of that makes the show even more precious to me.

The istripper setting is so artificial. An industrial studio, with a hard stage, and a green screen. It is the most unsexy setting imaginable. In contrast, Agatha shot for W4B on the cliffs on the coast overlooking the blue sea. Her show was 8 minutes long and she was done.

The paradox is the istripper performances can be the most real because there is little cutting and ***** of footage. We get to see the whole female form, which is unusual in movie formats, and we get to see it in multiple positions in one clip. And of course girls will attempt to truly dance which is also unusual on other sites. I really hope Agatha contrasts this performance with a much more confident one later, that would make a complete set.

I have no problems with scars, but I don´t like tatoos, don´t like them at all.

I have no problems with scars, but I don´t like tatoos, don´t like them at all.

I totally agree.