Here i want to provide a list of pantyless shows i found.
I checked the photos to determine this so if the model wears panties in the show but they are not visible on the photos i apologize.

Feel free to let us know though. Also feel free to add more shows as this list is be no means complete

iStripper XXX




iStripper

@Starryk - we cannot really list them all here with pictures as the numbers are HUGE.

When I am doing QA, I track shows that are pantyless or bottomless (where the pants are removed first but not from under a dress - e.g. a bikini where the top is kept on) and just in the most recent 470 shows there are

99 pantyless
134 bottomless

I should say though that these are shows where in at least one clip the model is pantyless. If you are looking for shows where the model just does not possess a pair of panties, then those numbers are smaller.

@pickle1: I am looking at shows with a dress and no panties right now. Those are the ones that interest me most.
Of course that is a matter of personal taste.

But I can tempt you with an upcoming show - Freya Mayer - The Pink String Number.

Freya totally forgot her underwear. 😊

And don't forget Sasha Meow "Picnic Time"

continuing the list

thanks for mentioning. Sadly only table clips in this one

Liya Silver - 0602
Jessica Night - 0990
Stella Cardo - 0948
Milena Ray - 0836

A few others that fit your criteria I think.

@thehiddenant
Thanks for adding to he list



I can add


She does wear a pantyhose but about 50% of the clips she doesn't wear them. Only the skirt and nothing below. And it is a fantastic show

Btw the trick to add the card pics is to use the linkset tag and between it the collection and card id so e1801 for Lana (e for iStripper and f for iStripper XXX)

Jessica Night

Thank you very much!!!!!....I have enriched my collection 👍

Time ago I proposed a new "pantyless" tag, but the proposal was ***** panned by TheEmu, so...only a manual search may help us :)

Time ago I proposed a new "pantyless" tag, but the proposal was ***** panned by TheEmu, so...only a manual search may help us :)

@Anjin62 - the problem with any new tag proposal is the effort required to go through 5,000+ shows to fiid the examples so that the tag is accurate and useful.

Some are easier than others to do. If you can set a tag by just looking at the card image, it is time consuming but possible.

But for any tag that could occur in any clip at random in a show, it is one hell of a task. If you want to know any show where the girl at some stage is pantyless, that falls into that latter category.

If you want to know shows where the girl just never wears panties, Starryk has helped you above.

To add to @Pickle1 's reply, that 5,000+ shows he refers to comprise over 100,000 clips which need to be examined for this sort of tag. A colossal task for a small team.

@TheEmu

A colossal task for a small team.

Yes, but this is something that can be group sourced. If a lot of people each review a few cards and report their results to a facilitator, that person could submit the result to Totem and totem's workload would be minimal. All that is needed is a few dozen volunteers. 😉

All that is needed is a few dozen volunteers.

Has there been any sign that there would be a few dozen volunteers ?

@Dorsai6 - it was this kind of activity we tried to do a couple of years ago with a re-tagging exercise and we did discover how difficult it is.

The first thing to be done is to establish a very clear definition of what is "pantyless" so that any volunteers are working to the same definition because, believe me, a few dozen people can have a few dozen different views.

You then need a few dozen people with full collections to volunteer and commit 100% to the task in hand and the timescale - because one weak link, one person who backs out will totally piss-off the others and the exercise will collapse.

And finally you need the facilitator who will also have to be the validator - random sampling the output of the few dozen people to make sure they have followed the definition - and what does that person do if any of the few dozen went rogue?

It really is not that simple if it is to be done properly and accurately.

Rika Fane/Skintight Latex - f1215

Time ago I proposed a new "pantyless" tag, but the proposal was ***** panned by TheEmu, so...only a manual search may help us :)
@Anjin62 - the problem with any new tag proposal is the effort required to go through 5,000+ shows to fiid the examples so that the tag is accurate and useful.

Some are easier than others to do. If you can set a tag by just looking at the card image, it is time consuming but possible.

But for any tag that could occur in any clip at random in a show, it is one hell of a task. If you want to know any show where the girl at some stage is pantyless, that falls into that latter category.

If you want to know shows where the girl just never wears panties, Starryk has helped you above.

Hi Pikle1, welcome back TheEmu,
they haven't to examine every single CLIP...but only the CARDS where the model that are pantiless...and I bet/hope that TOTEM knows wich card was shooted with wich kind of clothes/accessories...and panties.

So they don't need examine 100.00. clips, but only thoose archives; because I hope that TOTEM, like every serious company, have some DIGITAL archives where was wrote how the model was dressed.

Easy, isn't it?

Last, but not least, if there is a category "SOCKS" why cannot be a category "PANTILESS"?

Rika Fane/Skintight Latex - f1215

Thank You.....added!!!!

they haven't to examine every single CLIP...but only the CARDS where the model that are pantiless

Just how do you propose to determine which cards have no clips in which panties are worn ? Certainly it would be less than all clips but it would also entail looking at much more than one clip per card.

I would be delighted if Totem provided a few of my favourite clothing tags - but they would almost certainly be rather different from yours (my personal highest priority clothing tags would be Bra, Panties, Suspender Belt, Blouse, Seamed Stockings, Silk or Satin).

For a long time I have wished that for each card Totem had provided a full list of the items of clothing being worn and discarded. But though that would have been practical if it had been a feature from the start it, along with similar ideas, would not be practical now.

P.S. would a card level "pantiless" tag be equivalent to "no panties" in which case a "Panties" tag would seem to be the more obvious choice alongside the existing "dress", "skirt", "stockings" and "socks" tags.

because I hope that TOTEM ... have some DIGITAL archives where was wrote how the model was dressed.

If that was the case it wouldnot have been necessary for one of the moderators to have undertaken reviewing the whole collection in order to introduce the "socks" category.

they haven't to examine every single CLIP...but only the CARDS where the model that are pantiless
Just how do you propose to determine which cards have no clips in which panties are worn ? Certainly it would be less than all clips but it would also entail looking at much more than one clip per card.

I would be delighted if Totem provided a few of my favourite clothing tags - but they would almost certainly be rather different from yours (my personal highest priority clothing tags would be Bra, Panties, Suspender Belt, Blouse, Seamed Stockings, Silk or Satin).

For a long time I have wished that for each card Totem had provided a full list of the items of clothing being worn and discarded. But though that would have been practical if it had been a feature from the start it, along with similar ideas, would not be practical now.

P.S. would a card level "pantiless" tag be equivalent to "no panties" in which case a "Panties" tag would seem to be the more obvious choice alongside the existing "dress", "skirt", "stockings" and "socks" tags.


because I hope that TOTEM ... have some DIGITAL archives where was wrote how the model was dressed.
If that was the case it wouldnot have been necessary for one of the moderators to have undertaken reviewing the whole collection in order to introduce the "socks" category.

Thank you for your 5 cents...

Now I wonder what's your problem: why you feel the urge to say NO; why you are so negative...It's an Emu's mindset?

I don't understand: are you a Totem employee?, are you a moderator?...How you know that TOTEM have no archives, databases...?

Who are you, or who do you believe to be?

Have a nice day :)

I think we all agree, the idea is easy. The difficulty is making it happen.
Some have already started spreadsheets and working programs which "sort" items, it has already been started. There is already a posting for mistagged cards.

My two cents:
Start a post section on this forum. The section could be called "NEW TAGS" or something. Each new category could be the items to sort. If someone starts a category of Pantyless, members can add to the list. After a while, Totem can decide that there is a full enough category (1000 tags)

If totem does nothing more than add this section to the forum, I can still make a playlist for myself based upon the suggestions of the members.

why you feel the urge to say NO; why you are so negative..

I do not have an urge to say no, but I do try to be realistic about what is practical.

How you know that TOTEM have no archives, databases...?

I don't know, any more than you do. But there is no evidence to support your hope that they have one that can be used in the way that you want while there is some, albeit weak, evidence that there is no such database - the evidence being that in an exercise similar to the one that you are proposing someone did have to go through the collection manually.

My two cents:
Start a post section on this forum. The section could be called "NEW TAGS" or something. Each new category could be the items to sort. If someone starts a category of Pantyless, members can add to the list. After a while, Totem can decide that there is a full enough category (1000 tags)

Your 2 cents are really appreciate, thank you!! 😄

@TheEmu

I don't know, any more than you do.

Thank you, so you are only a background noise. :)

But I can tempt you with an upcoming show - Freya Mayer - The Pink String Number.

Freya totally forgot her underwear. 😊

And don't forget Sasha Meow "Picnic Time"

Miss, i forgot my PE kit ...

Well you will just have to get something out of the lost bin.

older card from 2008
Jenna Sweet & Amandine / Student room
in this time many short clips (total 23)
most no nude and topless but at clip 14 they start lifting the skirts

Now that I'm looking at some older cards:
maybe this is a problem because 1 out of 2 girls is pantyless?
(and both only table clips)

Susan Snow & Elisa / Duo
Only Elisa is pantyless in dress (in 2 of the 9 clips (excl. preview) rests completely naked)

Samanthe Jolie & Leila Smith /Duo
Only Samantha Jolie pantyless under skirt (in 2 of the 9 clips (excl. preview) rest totally naked)

one other duos with only one pantyless

• Wellie & Leonelle Knoxville / Duo

And both pantyless

• Susan & Leonie Knoxville / Duo

Both only table clips

@sjaakie Thank you!!!! ❤️