This card is listed as full nudity. But as you can see ALL her cards were supposed to be XXX. Also there is no Anal tag whereas her model info clearly states her shows will all feature some unforgetable anal scenes.

@mitchell

This card is listed as full nudity.

Because this is an Full Nudity Show only.

But as you can see ALL her cards were supposed to be XXX.

This is the generic Introduction Text for her. Take a closer look on all her Cards in your Collection
or inside the .xml Files in your Data Directory.

Also there is no Anal tag

Because this is an Full Nudity Show only.

I believe that info was accurate for her Take 1, but she does have some full nudity only shows in her Take 2. Looks like they just didn't update the text.

You are correct @VagueAbond - the blurb on the model's card does not tend to get updated.

Just look at Melena Maria Rya - her text has not changed since 2015!

@mitchell
It seems "Introduction Text" was written for 1st set of 6 cards which were indeed all XXX.
She has one more card that is not XXX in 2nd set.
Notte Di Nozze_e1585 , still to come, and with Baby, It's Cold Outside_e1584 , that is 10 out of 12, XXX. 👌
So, "she's a sexual *****" , 👍.

Just look at Melena Maria Rya - her text has not changed since 2015!

Same for Little Caprice - same text on card in 2013 as on the new set, but still very applicable.

It is mileading though. Even if unintentional. I can see a new user with auto buy being upset when she or he realizes that the card is not what was expected. Ithink that model info should be different for each new take. I don't see that as an unreasonable request or particularly difficult to do. I could be wrong though. I'm pretty sure that various mods would do it for free. I would if I had access.

I think that text is same for all a models cards and is just picked up by the system from one place. No chance I reckon to go back over thousands of cards. Possible perhaps to do in future if the system was changed, but probably no simple job. Same as with my gripe about show lengths. Not always very accurate, but not really a massive issue. The girls still do their thing.

"I'm pretty sure that various mods would do it for free."

Not sure which moderators you have spoken to but I would be obliged if you did not assume on my behalf what I want to do - and even what I am allowed to do - text on the model details page is the sole responsibility of the team.

C'est pour le coup du pinaillage! de l'ergotage!. La carte de la miss dit clairement que ce n'est pas une carte explicite.😆

@mitchell

I can see a new user with auto buy being upset when she or he realizes that the card is not what was expected.

Not sure about your Intention, but there is a "User Manual" inside the Client created for the Users of iStripper,
which is explaining the whole Functionality from the iStripper Client.

Furthermore here on the Forum there is as Section called Did you know that... ? where @celine created
several useful Topics for "the Users" of iStripper.
And here we have a good Start for that.

https://www.istripper.com/forum/thread/45748/1

Du bist nicht befugt dieses Thema zu sehen oder auf mit dem Thema verwandte Daten zuzugreifen

The Cards in the Store have also a Label which is in my Opinion clearly visible, and hopefully understandable.
Because i don't want to believe that the Humanity is getting Dumber and Dumber.

I know it's difficult for a new User to not get distracted from the Girls,
but everyone which is taking themself the Time to read these Things shouldn't land in a "Trap"

Unfortunately the Users are ignoring most of the Times a User Manual, which was written for the Users.

I've found using this forum useful and fun with the banter. Plenty of useful tips (or should that be tits) come through it. Lots of ideas and links like above. As for using "auto buy" that always seemed crazy to me. I want to see something of what I can get and the previews are the best way. Many cards I will just never want. The card info is just a guide, not always the best, I trust my own eyes even if they are on stalks at times.

I've found using this forum useful and fun with the banter. Plenty of useful tips (or should that be tits) come through it. Lots of ideas and links like above. As for using "auto buy" that always seemed crazy to me. I want to see something of what I can get and the previews are the best way. Many cards I will just never want. The card info is just a guide, not always the best, I trust my own eyes even if they are on stalks at times.

Agreed.

Well stated.

I will add...
... some models are an auto buy, but that is on me, not the program.
... While card info and ratings are a guide, I do "listen" to ratings from some users because they have been a trusted source for a while.

I think some of the responders here who are taking offence are missing my point. The fact is that the information IS misleading and technically incorrect. I never said it ws the end of the world. If it is indeed a difficult task no problem. And if my comment that some of the moderators would probably do it for free offended or disgusted them then I do appologize. I did not realize that it was an offensive topic. I will cease and desist.

@mitchell

who are taking offence are missing my point.

At least not in my Case, but usually a problem with a Text based Conversation.

The fact is that the information IS misleading and technically incorrect.

I made three Screenshots (i'm coming to the third one later) where it's clearly visible that there are
two different Showtypes because of their Indicator/Label for that Show.

A Show which is marked as Full Nudity, hasn't any Sexually Explicit Content (like Dildos, Finger in Pussy/Ass).
It was the case since several Years here, and i think it will not Change in the Future ... we will see.

And because of that Introduction Text, see it as a Funny and Entertaining Addition to the Show,
but don't take it as a serious Indicator for the Content inside the Show.

As an example, and now to my third Screenshot please read the Introduction Text for Kaleesy,
and please put your Focus on this.

She regularly spend time shopping in Paris. I'm sure Kaleesy will soon come back and ring at the studios door :)

And now the Question is, did Kaleesy ring the Bell on the Studio Doors again since August 2017 ?
I guess No, but it would be Nice for sure :)

So as you can see that Introduction Text is a Funny and Entertaining Addition to the Show,
nothing more nothing less.

I did not realize that it was an offensive topic.

I didn't see it as an offensive Topic, but it's important to bring Clarification about an Situation.

see it as a Funny and Entertaining Addition to the Show, but don't take it as a serious Indicator for the Content inside the Show.

Absolutely. I think that when I first joined that there were separate descriptions for each card and I liked reading them even though I never took much notice of what they said.

In any case the current system of having a common text used for all of a model's cards has been in place for several years and has resulted in some oddities. I remember commenting on one that described the particular costume worn for a card but the same text was then used for the other cards made by that model where it made no sense at all.

At least Marica is getting some more Attention :)

Hi guys, thank you very much for your feedback. I have forwarded this thread to the team : )

But as you can see ALL her cards were supposed to be XXX.

Not really - it has been clearly said by Team that her take 1 included just XXX shows, but also that take 2 would have included 2 plain shows.
The blurb on the bio page is clearly outdated and has to be changed, but I don't find this to be a shocking or quite urgent issue.

Update: the blurb has already been updated.

@stanson
i understand where you are coming from and as a long time member i personally did not expect xxx content in that specific card given the full nudity label. i was simply pointing out that the information in the intro is innacurate for the NEW Channelle cards. And that a NEW member might mistakenly assume it was xxx if she or he had enabled auto and clicked on the card without first looking at the details. as for offence i'll leave it to you to read the comments. if its not technically possible to write a different intro just for a NEW TAKE of a model, or not feasable because of whatever reason no worries.
i think it would be good for the intro for each new set be consistent with the content. But hey that's just me. i accept that i might be in the minority on this one. no ***** no foul.

I saw the updated bio. Well at least i was not crazy for pointing out a clear innacuracy.Thank you Totem.

i accept that i might be in the minority on this one.

Keep in mind @mitchell i'm running iStripper inside Linux, so when someone is in a minoritory here,
then i'm the one 😛

no ***** no foul.

Don't worry, and have a nice evening so far :)