hi
some of these cards the decription is not what it supposed to be.....especially on like the topless and full nudity cards...like for example...like card 814...angelica kitten...theres supposed to be 9 full nudity clips...and im sure you guys saw this card...theres not 9...so the descriptions are not what they are supposed to be...anyone agree and whey they arent correct?

Lloyd

Hello Lloydn,

Do you have more examples ? Let me check this with my colleagues.

Thank you : )
Regards
Manue

Well... by the standars of the time there are 9 "Explicit" clips, that is 9 Full Nude clips with the new language. What one need to remember is that the level system isn't about layers of clothing but the level of erotic content.

Now let's take a look at each Full Nude and X-rated clip of this card:

0402 - Back in the day sexy hand inside panties made clips Explicit (04 level now known as Full Nudity)
1403 - Same, hand inside panties and ass to screen showing just to much.
1404 - Spreading with hand inside panties rubbing pussy. removing pants spreading and rubbing.
1405 - No panties taking dress off spreading and touching nude.
1406 - Nude spreading ass to screen.
1507 - X-rated for spreading, rubbing and fingering.
64401 - Full striptease, spreading and touching nude.
66402 - Hand inside panties rubbing.
66408 - Hand inside panties rubbing.
68404 - Hand inside panties rubbing. (tame, maybe only nude even by the old standard)

In the past I checked and rechecked all new cards that came out and I'm pretty sure the team got tired of my suggestions at times. The level system is like trying to judge a figureskating competition. Sometimes the line between a 4 and a 5 is very fuzzy. What may count as "Full Nude" to one person may only be seen as "Topless" by another. Again, remember we are talking about level of erotica and not layers of clothes.

The only time when the TEAM really care is if there's nudity in a No Nudity clip... other than that they have made it clear that they will not go back and change the ratings of older cards.

Hope this explain the levels present in this card and the system by which it was rated.

Cheers!
//CivXL

i have a good example for this its a jenni p card - card 557 - pure bliss....now if u look at the descriptions of the clips they say topless and nudity and full nudity...now i know you go by level of erotic content but if someone was to look at the descriptions of the clips they might believe that....ive been fooled a few times too..i know cards are different and models do shows different way but that can ***** someone or something..that should be explaned somehow or something....i love this service and hope you guys keep improving on it

i mean jenni gregg...sorry

I agree that the language is a bit misleading but I can also understand the problem for the Team to describe the level of erotica in as few words as possible in the menu system.

Maybe it would help if the Team add more info to the FAQ and Tooltip (?) about the subject. Now there's no info about what to expect from each level.

We've travelled this road before - even asked for local overide of the level descriptions and rating given so people could make them more meaningful as far as their peference goes. Part of the problem is that the level is extracted from a digit positon of the filename for the clip so there are all sorts of side effects of changing it. Totem's view is that they should determine the level and the description of the clip and introducing any system by which the user base could change it would lead to difficulties and people breaking their installation if they mucked it up. The argument is that we have to realise that not all users are 'expert' level when it comes to computers. My view is that those people wouldn't want to change it, and anyone who does has to accept that they do it at their own risk. But I can't see the previous decision being reconsidered.