There should be a basic interface for those that just simply want the girls to be in the background, and intuitive/detailed interface for those of us who require personal useability.I agree and I'd like to see a lot more capabilities built into the VG application.
I'm not a programmer but I doubt this would require too much hardwork and cost, compared to what they'd get back in memberships and purchase in cards.I am a programmer. Although I don't do much coding these days, I've been programming since 1963. Developing a good user interface (UI) to deliver the kind of clip management capability we are talking about is not a small task. The back end is simple, but the UI would probably be more complex than the entire current VG UI. Testing and making this kind of UI bullet- and idiot- proof is not cheap. Do it wrong and you have a lot of very angry customers. You think Totem would see a cost reward from doing this. I'm not so sure; however, I'd still like them to do it.
'User friendly' is one of the most important aspects of a service.Yes it is. However, the definition of user friendly varies from person to person. Delivering unwanted capabilities is not user friendly. Hiding existing capabilties (a complaint I have about the current VG app) isn't user friendly either. Programmers who are great at doing work "under the hood" often have a lot of trouble delivering a user friendly UI. I learned this the hard way when I wrote my first Mac application in 1985-1988.
Als ein Gratisnutzer von iStripper bist du nicht berechtigt Beiträge zu schreiben oder neue Topics zu starten.
Aber du hast Zugriff auf die grundlegenden Bereiche und kannst unsere Community kennen lernen